#Upper volta with rockets full#

Nowadays we have neither democracy nor liberalism. If the Soviet Union was jokingly referred to as “Upper Volta with rockets,” then modern Russia is better described as “Upper Volta with iPhones.” We no longer have the choice between illiberal democracy and undemocratic liberalism. By attempting authoritarian modernization, we ended up with authoritarian regression. As a result, we profaned political democracy. In this case Vladimir Putin, the new young leader, was cynically constructed as the opposite image of his predecessor.īoris Yeltsin was used to guarantee the transfer of power to Putin, someone who seemed at the time like a rational, controllable bureaucrat, a man who wasn’t even a politician. When you decide that it’s possible to control elections, then you can also impose a leader on the people. This was later implemented when Yeltsin passed the “scepter of the nation” to Putin. Modern Russia’s dishonest elections grew out of the experimentation of the 1990s.Īnother way in which Yeltsin’s victory of 1996 ultimately became a Pyrrhic one was that it legitimized the idea that there could be a controlled handover of power in Russia. But we can see a direct line between the price paid back then for victory and subsequent developments. Those efforts to get Yeltsin elected look positively amateur compared to the electoral manipulations we see today.

#Upper volta with rockets full#

You could say that this moment marked the fall of the Russian political class, symbolized by the infamous incident in which Yeltsin aides were caught carrying Xerox boxes full of cash. Now, twenty years on, we can see the adverse consequences of the final second-round result of July 3, 1996, in which Yeltsin beat Zyuganov. Strictly speaking, a vote for Yeltsin was a rational, anti-populist vote. And they used the fact that much of the Russian public was voting not so much for the first Russian president as against the alternative. Back then, nobody could have imagined that twenty years later Russians might begrudgingly cast their ballots for the communists as a protest vote against the Kremlin.Īt the time, some in the Kremlin believed Yeltsin had to recapture his post by any means possible. When Chubais said that Yeltsin’s election victory was the “final nail hammered into the coffin of communism” it sounded like a definitive verdict. The fear of “red-brown” communist-fascists was not abstract, especially with the violence of the 1993 constitutional crisis still fresh in the mind. Stalin had not yet been rehabilitated and made fashionable again. Boris Yeltsin won and Russia made the inglorious transition from oligarchic capitalism to the state capitalism, authoritarianism, and resource nationalism of the Putin era.īack in 1996, the Communists did not appear “velvet” or safe. If that had happened, today’s Russia might more closely resemble the Czech Republic, or perhaps Hungary or Poland with their right-wing populism.īut what happened happened.

And Putin-the-Politician would never have stepped onto the Russian political stage. No doubt President Zyuganov would have flopped in the 2000 elections-if, of course, he himself had allowed them to take place. He is certainly not one of the “pink Communists” who came to power in Central and Eastern Europe at that time, such as Poland’s Aleksander Kwasniewski, who abandoned their previous ideological positions. Zyuganov, the peaceable grumpy Stalinist, probably would have become, at best, a second version of Belarus’s Alexander Lukashenko. We cannot know how “velvet” a 1996 Communist regime would have been. Both of these outcomes were distinct possibilities-so much so that in the spring of 1996 Yeltsin’s close adviser Anatoly Chubais cautioned the president against banning the Communist Party.īut let us imagine for a moment. That might have resulted in a fresh outbreak of the civil violence that wracked Moscow in October 1993. If defeat looked likely, the government might have canceled the elections or banned the Communist Party altogether. A conservative-backed Yeltsin might have lost his popular appeal, in which case he wouldn’t have won at all.

Of course these counterfactual questions only beg more questions. What would have happened to Russia if Zyuganov had won in 1996? And how would things have been different if Yeltsin, the incumbent, had won not with a liberal mandate but with the conservative one of some of his backers in the Kremlin, such as his chief bodyguard Alexander Korzhakov. Yeltsin eventually won a contest that at the time was felt to be decisive in the country’s march toward democracy.

Two decades ago this month, Boris Yeltsin faced Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov in the runoff of Russia’s presidential election.